![]() 03/01/2018 at 08:03 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I thought I would build a muscle truck on Chevy’s website. Much frustration was had.
First, when I went to select the 6.2 engine it won’t let you do that in a single cab truck, you can only select that option on a double or crew cab. Fine Chevy, I’ll play your games. I change to a double cab and select the 6.2...what the hell? The price shot up to ~$45k, turns out you also can’t get the 6.2 unless you have the LTZ trim...seriously?
Anyways here’s the truck I built but with the 5.3 motor. Came out to just under $31k, still a bit pricey for my taste though.
Also, I didn’t realize you can still option vehicles with manual windows. Neat.
![]() 03/01/2018 at 08:57 |
|
Welcome to the dynamics of the ‘murican truck market. Why give them the 6.2 for 30k when they’ll pay almost 50k for it? Why indeed!
![]() 03/01/2018 at 09:05 |
|
You know what they say more money, more problems...Chevy is really only doing you a service
![]() 03/01/2018 at 09:18 |
|
The 355hp 5.3 is no slouch tho. I think the reasoning with the cab configs is that the 10 speed trans would make the driveshaft too short. You can get a 6.0 2500 for $34k, not much more power but a simpler engine with more potential.
![]() 03/01/2018 at 09:22 |
|
I could see that on the single cab short bed, but you couldn’t select it for a single cab long bed either but could for a double cab short bed. I think those 2 are pretty much the same size.
I know the 5.3 would still move this truck around well, I still wish you could option it with the 6.2.
![]() 03/01/2018 at 09:26 |
|
It would be a cool option for sure. But this is Chevy, not Dodge we are talking about.
![]() 03/01/2018 at 09:55 |
|
What would be wrong with a shorter driveshaft? Something to do with pinion angle?
![]() 03/01/2018 at 10:08 |
|
Yeah a 6.2L shorted single cab is something I try to make every couple of months on the Chevy website. They should make a special edition version and straight up call it a muscle truck
![]() 03/01/2018 at 10:19 |
|
Basically, and since they have to take into account the entire range of motion from the suspension travel a shorter driveshaft makes that angle much larger
![]() 03/01/2018 at 10:21 |
|
If they made a “Muscle Truck” edition and priced it at $35k base I bet they would sell a decent amount of them.
![]() 03/01/2018 at 10:30 |
|
Hm, I wonder if a two-piece driveshaft would have helped relieve some of that angle... if there was room for it.
![]() 03/01/2018 at 10:32 |
|
The funny thing here is that Ford basically has that market to themselves. Raptor SuperCab Shortbed is the closest thing to a muscle truck by a mile.
Granted those are $50k to start but that’s lack of competition for you
![]() 03/01/2018 at 10:37 |
|
Yup, actually saw a used one of those on a Ford lot last year around this time and was tempted at the ~$30k price tag. As much as I want a muscle truck I just can’t justify one to my wife until we have a lot more “fun” money
![]() 03/02/2018 at 06:30 |
|
Can you still you get one of Dodge’s tradesman models for like 30K and the 5.7? Hmm..I will go to Dodge’s site and report back.
EDIT - Hell yea, you can get the tradesman model with the 5.7! I spec’d one out with the chrome group, the power group, the 5.7 with a 3.92 limited slip, sliding rear window, and special paint “Agricultural Red” (LOL), for total of $32,400. That’s a pretty smoking deal for a 2 door “muscle truck”
![]() 03/02/2018 at 07:49 |
|
Not bad dodge, not bad
![]() 03/02/2018 at 10:16 |
|
A 5.7 with a 3.92 rear in a pickup. Burnouts for days!